Young-Earth advocates point to measurements showing the Earth’s magnetic
field is weakening over time, suggesting it could not have been sustaining life
for billions of years.
2. Soft Tissue in Fossils
Reports of preserved soft tissue in some dinosaur fossils are
interpreted by young-Earth supporters as evidence that these remains are
thousands, not millions, of years old.
3. Helium in Zircon Crystals
Some creationist studies claim that high levels of helium trapped in
zircon crystals indicate a much shorter timescale for radioactive decay than
conventional dating suggests.
4. Limited Sediment on the Ocean Floor
They argue that the relatively small amount of sediment on the ocean
floor implies only a few thousand years of accumulation, rather than millions.
If you’d like, I can also give you the mainstream scientific
rebuttals to each of these points so you can see both perspectives
clearly. Would you like me to do that?
Genesis
and genetics, plus carbon dating by Dr Don Batten
December 6, 2022
Christians are a “house divided” on the meaning of the
six days in Genesis 1, the age of the earth, and how much truth there is in
evolutionary theory. This year, we are paying particular attention to these
topics and are allowing speakers to present and argue for their views. This
applies to organizations that hold either young earth or old earth
perspectives.
On Thursday the 17th November, Don
Batten talked on Genesis and genetics from a young earth perspective. He
provided the following outline of his talk, including links to background
material:
- My journey from
theistic evolution / day-age to biblical creation and why I found it
compelling and important
- How the modern
molecular biology revolution undoes neo-Darwinism
- Bioinformatics:
the information in living things
- The
inadequacy of evolution to explain living things
- How the modern
science of genetics underscores Genesis as history
- Haldane’s
Dilemma creation.com/haldanes-dilemma-has-not-been-solved
- The
waiting time problem (a modern reworking of Haldane) creation.com/waiting-time-problem + creation.com/1-percent-myth
- Genetic
Entropy and the Fall creation.com/genetic-entropy
- Adam
and Eve & genetics: what the Y-chromosome and mitochondrial DNA
diversity tell us. An Overview of the Independent Histories of the
Human Y Chromosome and the Human Mitochondrial chromosome https://doi.org/10.15385/jpicc.2018.8.1.15
- Human
genetic diversity: from one man? https://doi.org/10.15385/jpicc.2018.8.1.20
- Human
genetic diversity: the timeframe
- Longevity
in Genesis and genetics creation.com/rapid-decline-biblical-lifespans https://creation.com/living-as-long-as-methuselah
- DNA
bar codes of metazoans creation.com/recent-origin-of-species
- Carbon dating:
residual carbon-14 as a problem for deep time digitalcommons.cedarville.edu/icc_proceedings/vol5/iss1/12/ (Measurable 14C in
Fossilized Organic Materials: Confirming the Young Earth Creation-Flood
Model) www.icr.org/article/young-radiocarbon-old-samples
His talk is on YouTube.
Don
Batten
Don received both his B.Sc.Agr. (First Class Honours)
and his Ph.D. from the University of Sydney. He worked for 20 years as a
research horticulturalist with the NSW Department of Agriculture. He
conducted a number of research projects and published his results in scientific
journals. Don joined the Creation Ministries International (CMI) in Brisbane,
Australia in 1994 and has spoken around the world on the creation issue. He is
co-author of The Creation Answers Book, One Blood, Answers to the 4 Big
Questions, 15 Reasons to Take Genesis as History, and author of various
booklets, including What about carbon dating? and What about arguments for
evolution? Dr Batten was the CEO and Managing Director of CMI-Australia from
2015 to 2022. He is now Senior Scientist, focusing on research, writing, and
speaking.
5 Signs the World is Young! · Podcasts · Creation.com
….
You could be forgiven for thinking that the age of the
earth has been established with absolute, unquestionable certainty. The
scientific evidence, we are told, has conclusively shown that it is 4.543
billion years old (give or take a smidgeon). Case closed.
Hold on—not so fast! Is this really ‘case closed’?
What most people have NOT heard is that there are many
scientists around the world who vigorously disagree with this conclusion. On
what evidence? Well, they, too, say “Science!”
Join one such scientist—biologist and science
communicator, Dr Don Batten—for a discussion of just five (of the many)
scientific evidences that point to a young earth.
(Also, note the extensive supporting material in the
‘links and show notes’, below.)
✍️ Links and
Show Notes
- 101 evidences for a young age of the earth and
the universe
- 4 Evidences for a Young Earth
- Why the Earth Can’t be Old!
- Earth Can’t be Old – Answering the Critics
- The age of arches
- A new mechanism to form freestanding arches
questionable
- Many arches and natural bridges likely from the
Flood
- A dangerous view
- Darwin’s Arch collapses … and joins a growing
collection
- Another one bites the dust
- Salty seas: Evidence for a young earth
- Sea salt loses its savour for evolutionists
- Fantastic folds: Curvy rock layers undermine
millions of years
- Warped earth
- The “folding of solid rocks”
- Grand Canyon strata show geologic time is
imaginary
- ‘Flat gaps’ in sedimentary rock layers challenge
long geologic ages
- Much supposed geological time missing from strata
- ‘Millions of years’ are missing
- The case of the ‘missing’ geologic time
- The meaning of unconformities
- More than a billion years missing from the Great
Unconformity at the Grand Canyon?
- Helium evidence for a young world continues to
confound critics
- Answer to a persistent critic of RATE helium
research
- Argon from RATE site confirms the earth is young
- Argon diffusion data support RATE’s 6,000-year
helium age of the earth
- Radiometric dating and old ages in disarray
….
